Counter-Strike 2
1400x1050@144Hz·09:40 played
Redkent·15h ago
Public6 Tips
61
FPSAverage
44
FPS1% Low
59%/55°C
72%/64°C
8 GB
87%usage
Core i7-720QM vs Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core i7-720QM is much slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K on average across 100+ games and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $389.06 cheaper!
Core i7-720QM4% Score
- Up to 62% cheaper – $149.94 vs $539.00
Core Ultra 9 285K74% Score
- Up to 355% faster on average across 100+ games
- Is 15 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 181% better value for money
- Up to 62% more expensive – $539.00 vs $149.94
FPS Comparison Across Popular Games
Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.
Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.
Base Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 9 285K has a 131% higher base clock.
Turbo Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 9 285K boosts 104% higher.
LGAG1
Sockethelp
LGA1851Clarksfield
Codenamehelp
Arrow Lake-SMobile
Segmenthelp
DesktopNone
Integrated GPUhelp
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU1333 MHz (DDR3)
RAMhelp
6400 MHz (DDR5)Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
OverclockableFrequently Asked Questions
compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core i7-720QM or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K. It's 1750% faster than the Core i7-720QM on average across 100+ games, scoring 74/100 vs 4/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285K than Core i7-720QM?expand_more
1750% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core i7-720QM or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285K worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 74/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Core i7-720QM and Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
Performance: Core i7-720QM scores 4/100, Core Ultra 9 285K scores 74/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Core i7-720QM or Core Ultra 9 285K bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core i7-720QM or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger pick at 74/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.
Popular Comparisons
i7-720QM vs Ryzen 7 7800X3Di7-720QM vs Ryzen 7 9700Xi7-720QM vs Ryzen 9 9900Xi7-720QM vs Ryzen 7 7700Xi7-720QM vs Ultra 7 265KFi7-720QM vs Ryzen 5 5500i7-720QM vs Ryzen 7 9850X3Di7-720QM vs Ryzen 5 7600Xi7-720QM vs Ultra 5 245Ki7-720QM vs Ultra 7 270K Plusi7-720QM vs Ryzen 5 8500Gi7-720QM vs Ultra 5 245KFi7-720QM vs Ryzen 5 4500i7-720QM vs i3-12100Fi7-720QM vs Ryzen 5 7500X3Di7-720QM vs i3-7100Ti7-720QM vs i5-4670i7-720QM vs Ryzen 5 3500Xi7-720QM vs Ryzen 5 5600i7-720QM vs i5-4440SUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9700XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9900XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 7700XUltra 9 285K vs Ultra 7 265KFUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 5500Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7600XUltra 9 285K vs Ultra 5 245KUltra 9 285K vs Ultra 7 270K PlusUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 8500GUltra 9 285K vs Ultra 5 245KFUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 4500Ultra 9 285K vs i3-12100FUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DUltra 9 285K vs i3-7100TUltra 9 285K vs i5-4670Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 3500XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 5600Ultra 9 285K vs i5-4440S