HowManyFPS Desktop App v1.25.4Track Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Ryzen 7 8700F

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is much slower than the Ryzen 7 8700F on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

View All CPUs

Up to 248% more expensive – $939 vs $208.11

CPU

$208.11View CPUAll CPUs

Up to 104% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 9 years and 8 months newer
Up to 248% cheaper – $208.11 vs $939
Up to 609% better value for money

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

Counter-Strike 22023

Xeon E5-2640 v3

487FPS

Ryzen 7 8700F

709FPS

Grand Theft Auto V2013

Xeon E5-2640 v3

199FPS

Ryzen 7 8700F

221FPS

League of Legends2009

Xeon E5-2640 v3

186FPS

Ryzen 7 8700F

372FPS

Minecraft2011

Xeon E5-2640 v3

596FPS

Ryzen 7 8700F

783FPS

Elden Ring2022

Xeon E5-2640 v3

149FPS

Ryzen 7 8700F

172FPS

Apex Legends2019

Xeon E5-2640 v3

Ryzen 7 8700F

Escape From Tarkov2017

Xeon E5-2640 v3

215FPS

Ryzen 7 8700F

254FPS

Fortnite2017

Xeon E5-2640 v3

324FPS

Ryzen 7 8700F

329FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Xeon E5-2640 v3

28%

Ryzen 7 8700F

61%

Ryzen 7 8700F ranks 33 points higher.

Coreshelp

Threadshelp

L3 Cachehelp

20 MB

16 MB

Xeon E5-2640 v3 has 4 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Xeon E5-2640 v3

2.6 GHz

Ryzen 7 8700F

4.1 GHz

Ryzen 7 8700F has a 58% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Xeon E5-2640 v3

3.4 GHz

Ryzen 7 8700F

5 GHz

Ryzen 7 8700F boosts 47% higher.

TDPhelp

Xeon E5-2640 v3

90W

Ryzen 7 8700F

65W

Ryzen 7 8700F draws 25W less power.

Pricehelp

Xeon E5-2640 v3

Ryzen 7 8700F

$208.11

Xeon E5-2640 v3Ryzen 7 8700F

LGA2011-3

Sockethelp

AM5

Haswell-EP

Codenamehelp

Phoenix

Server/Workstation

Segmenthelp

Desktop

No Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPUhelp

No Integrated Graphics

1866 MHz (DDR4)

RAMhelp

5200 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Xeon E5-2640 v3 or Ryzen 7 8700F?expand_more

The Ryzen 7 8700F. It's 118% faster than the Xeon E5-2640 v3 on average across 100+ games, scoring 61/100 vs 28/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Ryzen 7 8700F than Xeon E5-2640 v3?expand_more

118% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Xeon E5-2640 v3 or Ryzen 7 8700F?expand_more

The Ryzen 7 8700F is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Ryzen 7 8700F worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 61/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Ryzen 7 8700F?expand_more

Performance: Xeon E5-2640 v3 scores 28/100, Ryzen 7 8700F scores 61/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Xeon E5-2640 v3 or Ryzen 7 8700F bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Xeon E5-2640 v3 or Ryzen 7 8700F?expand_more

The Ryzen 7 8700F is the stronger pick at 61/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.